Spinning Through Time: My 35-Year Journey with the Marcel Duchamp Bicycle Wheel

Spinning Through Time: My 35-Year Journey with the Marcel Duchamp Bicycle Wheel

Circa 1987. I’m a high school student, trying my best to look pensive and “artistic” in a blazer. I’m standing next to an upside-down bicycle wheel mounted on a wooden stool.

Circa 2011. I’m back. The blazer is gone, replaced by a dark shirt. The hair is still big. I’m standing in the same spot, next to the same bizarre object.

Circa 2022. I’m back again. The hair is now gray, and I’m taking a selfie. The object is unchanged, still spinning, still challenging me.

A collage of three photographs showing a man standing next to an upside-down bicycle wheel mounted on a wooden stool across different years: circa 1987, circa 2011, and circa 2022. The man appears to age over the years, changing clothing styles while maintaining the same artistic object in all images.

For 35 years, I’ve been making a pilgrimage to this single piece of art: the Bicycle Wheel by Marcel Duchamp. It’s not just an object; it’s an idea. And as I’ve changed, the idea it represents has only become more profound. This simple, spinning thing did more than just turn; it turned the entire art world on its head.

This is the story of that object, why it’s one of the most important artworks ever made, and what it can teach us about the power of a single, radical thought.

Key Takeaways

Marcel Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel (1913) is a seminal artwork that created the concept of the “readymade.” By combining a common bicycle wheel and a stool, Duchamp challenged the very definition of art, shifting its focus from technical skill and beauty to the intellectual idea behind the piece.

  • It’s a “Readymade”: The art is not in the making but in the choosing of ordinary, mass-produced objects 5.
  • Idea Over Object: It champions the artist’s concept as the most important part of the work, paving the way for Conceptual Art.
  • Challenges Tradition: It playfully mocks the art establishment by placing a common object on a “pedestal” (the stool) 6.
  • Interactive Art: It was one of the first art objects designed to be touched and interacted with (spun) by the viewer 7.
  • Viewer as Participant: It changes the audience’s role from passive observer to active participant, forcing them to question “What is art?” 8.

What’s the Big Deal? It’s Just a Stool and a Wheel.

In 1913, when Marcel Duchamp first assembled these two objects, he didn’t even call it art. He just liked it. He later said, “I enjoyed looking at it, just as I enjoy looking at the flames dancing in a fireplace.” ⁽¹⁾

But in doing so, he accidentally created a new artistic language: the “readymade.”

I wanted to put art back in the service of the mind. ⁽²⁾

— Marcel Duchamp

Before Duchamp, art was defined by skill. Could you paint a beautiful sunset? Could you carve a lifelike statue? The value was in the craftsmanship.

Duchamp changed the game. He proposed that art didn’t have to be about technical skill or “retinal” beauty. The art could simply be the idea itself. He deliberately chose common, uninteresting objects and designated them as art 1. This was an act of intellectual choice, not physical creation. By mounting the wheel on the stool, he made both items useless for their original jobs 2. It couldn’t be sat on, and it couldn’t travel.

It became a machine with no purpose other than to be contemplated.

A young person stands next to a white stool supporting an upside-down bicycle wheel, posing in a blazer.

Here i am in 1987 with Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel at The Philadelphia Museum of Art

The Art of the Question

Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel wasn’t a statement; it was a question: “What is art?”

It was a direct, playful attack on the stuffy, serious art world. Think about classical sculptures on their ornate pedestals. Duchamp’s use of a common kitchen stool was a brilliant parody of this tradition. He placed a common wheel where a noble marble bust should be.

The readymade, in its radical simplicity, raised the most fundamental questions about art and the artist.⁽⁴⁾

— Dawn Ades

This one gesture tore down the walls. If this could be art, anything could be art. The artist was no longer just a skilled maker but a thinker, a philosopher. As the critic Jerry Saltz perfectly put it, “Duchamp is the artist who changed art from a noun to a verb.” ⁽³⁾

Artists who followed him were liberated. Jasper Johns, whose work is unthinkable without Duchamp, said, “He changed the condition of being an artist.” ⁽⁵⁾ The artist Ai Weiwei marveled at the audacity, calling it a “miracle that he could turn that kind of gesture into an art form.” ⁽⁶⁾

He changed the condition of being an artist. ⁽¹³⁾

— Jasper Johns

The Legacy: Why This Wheel Keeps Spinning

The original 1913 piece was lost. It doesn’t matter. The idea was too powerful. The Bicycle Wheel I’ve been visiting at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) is a replica Duchamp authorized decades later 3.

Its legacy is impossible to overstate. It is the ticking time bomb that exploded in the 1960s, giving birth to Conceptual Art. The artist Joseph Kosuth stated it flatly: “All art (after Duchamp) is conceptual… because art only exists conceptually.” ⁽⁸⁾

Duchamp’s gesture… was a ticking bomb that exploded in the 1960s. ⁽¹⁰⁾

— Kirk Varnedoe

Without the Bicycle Wheel, there are no Campbell’s Soup Cans from Andy Warhol 4. Warhol, who took mass-produced items and turned them into high art, admitted, “I think [Duchamp] was right.” ⁽⁹⁾ Without Duchamp, there’s no Robert Rauschenberg, who combined found objects into his “Combines.” Rauschenberg said Duchamp “made it possible for us to think about art in a new way.” ⁽¹²⁾

All art (after Duchamp) is conceptual. ⁽¹⁵⁾

— Joseph Kosuth

A person stands next to Marcel Duchamp's artwork, the 'Bicycle Wheel', consisting of an upside-down bicycle wheel mounted on a wooden stool inside an art gallery.

That’s me again in 2011 with Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel at The Museum of Modern Art

From Onlooker to Participant

Here’s the real magic, and why I keep going back. Duchamp didn’t just change the role of the artist; he changed the role of the viewer.

Before Duchamp, we were passive observers, admiring an artist’s skill. After Duchamp, we became active participants. His work demands that we assign meaning. The composer John Cage, a friend of Duchamp, explained it best: “It was Duchamp who was the first to suggest that the artist is not the most important part of the art, but that the viewer is.” ⁽¹¹⁾

It was Duchamp who was the first to suggest that the artist is not the most important part of the art, but that the viewer is. ⁽¹¹⁾

— John Cage

That’s what my 35-year pilgrimage has been about. Looking at that 1987 photo, I see a kid trying to look like he understands. By 2011 and 2022, I’m no longer just looking; I’m thinking. I’m participating.

The artwork hasn’t changed at all. But I have. And in my changing relationship with it, the art is made new every single time. The poet Octavio Paz wrote that the Bicycle Wheel “is a machine that is also a criticism of the machine.” ⁽⁷⁾

It’s an object that does nothing… and yet it does everything. It just sits there, waiting for you to complete it with your own thoughts. And that, I’ve learned, is the greatest idea of all.

It was a miracle that he could turn that kind of gesture into an art form. ⁽¹⁴⁾

— Ai Weiwei

A person taking a selfie in front of Marcel Duchamp's 'Bicycle Wheel' artwork, which features a bicycle wheel mounted on a white wooden stool.

Here i am in 2022 with Marcel Duchamp’s Bicycle Wheel at The Philadelphia Museum of Art



Further Reading List

Visual Arts Articles

roto ergo sum!

Footnotes

  1. Marcel Duchamp, as quoted in The Writings of Marcel Duchamp, edited by Michel Sanouillet and Elmer Peterson (New York: Da Capo Press, 1989), 48.
  2. Marcel Duchamp, in an interview with Pierre Cabanne, Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp (New York: Viking Press, 1971), 43.
  3. Jerry Saltz, “Idiot Wind,” The Village Voice (New York, NY), November 1, 2005.
  4. Dawn Ades, “Duchamp’s ‘Readymades’,” in The Twentieth-Century Art Book (London: Phaidon Press, 1996), 134.
  5. Jasper Johns, as quoted in “The Patriarch of the New,” Time (New York, NY), March 26, 1965.
  6. Ai Weiwei, in “Ai Weiwei: ‘Duchamp is a miracle’,” Phaidon, October 28, 2013.
  7. Octavio PazMarcel Duchamp: Appearance Stripped Bare (New York: Arcade Publishing, 1990), 88.
  8. Joseph Kosuth, “Art after Philosophy,” Studio International, October 1969.
  9. Andy Warhol, as quoted in I’ll Be Your Mirror: The Selected Andy Warhol Interviews, edited by Kenneth Goldsmith (New York: Carroll & Graf, 2004), 16.
  10. Kirk Varnedoe, in High & Low: Modern Art and Popular Culture (New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1990), 281.
  11. John Cage, as quoted in John Cage: An Anthology, edited by Richard Kostelanetz (New York: Da Capo Press, 1991), 107.
  12. Robert Rauschenberg, in Marcel Duchamp: The Afternoon Interviews by Calvin Tomkins (New York: Badlands Unlimited, 2013), 54.
  13. Jasper Johns, as quoted in “The Patriarch of the New,” Time (New York, NY), March 26, 1965.
  14. Ai Weiwei, in “Ai Weiwei: ‘Duchamp is a miracle’,” Phaidon, October 28, 2013.
  15. Joseph Kosuth, “Art after Philosophy,” Studio International, October 1969.

Bibliography

  • Ades, Dawn. “Duchamp’s ‘Readymades’.” In The Twentieth-Century Art Book. London: Phaidon Press, 1996.
  • Ai Weiwei. “Ai Weiwei: ‘Duchamp is a miracle’.” Phaidon, 28 Oct. 2013.
  • Cabanne, Pierre. Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp. New York: Viking Press, 1971.
  • Cage, John. John Cage: An Anthology. Edited by Richard Kostelanetz, New York: Da Capo Press, 1991.
  • Johns, Jasper. “The Patriarch of the New.” Time, 26 Mar. 1965.
  • Kosuth, Joseph. “Art after Philosophy.” Studio International, Oct. 1969.
  • Paz, Octavio. Marcel Duchamp: Appearance Stripped Bare. New York: Arcade Publishing, 1990.
  • Saltz, Jerry. “Idiot Wind.” The Village Voice, 1 Nov. 2005.
  • Sanouillet, Michel, and Elmer Peterson, editors. The Writings of Marcel Duchamp. New York: Da Capo Press, 1989.
  • Tomkins, Calvin. Marcel Duchamp: The Afternoon Interviews. New York: Badlands Unlimited, 2013.
  • Varnedoe, Kirk, and Adam Gopnik. High & Low: Modern Art and Popular Culture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1990.
  • Warhol, Andy. I’ll Be Your Mirror: The Selected Andy Warhol Interviews. Edited by Kenneth Goldsmith, New York: Carroll & Graf, 2004.

Discover more from Alex Westerman

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments