The Empathy Chasm: Surviving the Lack of Empathy in a Relationship

The Empathy Chasm: Surviving the Lack of Empathy in a Relationship

The author reflects on a failed marriage, questioning whether love can endure when empathy is absent. Their experience highlights complex emotions and the painful realization that love’s foundation may have been built on illusion, not connection.

For 20 years, my husband, David, was my foundation. He was the person I was building a life with, the one constant in a world full of variables. As a gay couple, we’d navigated the unique complexities of our marriage, celebrating its merits against a society that wasn’t always ready to see them. Then came the health scares, culminating in brain surgery to remove a tumor. We survived it. I thought if we could get through that, we could get through anything. I was wrong. The lack of empathy in relationships can be a quiet poison, and his decision to file for divorce felt like the final, fatal dose.

​It wasn’t entirely out of the blue. He’d filed once before, left multiple times. But this time was different. This was the end. It forced me to confront a terrifying question: what happens when the person you love exhibits a profound lack of empathy? How does a marriage survive not just external obstacles, but an internal void? This exploration is my attempt to understand, to shed light on my situation, and perhaps, to be a reflection for others staring into a similar chasm of emotional abandonment.

Love does not begin and end the way we seem to think it does. Love is a battle, love is a war; love is a growing up.

James Baldwin ⁽³⁾


Table of contents

The Great Disconnect: Empathy vs. Sympathy in a Marriage

​I’ve come to realize that my husband and I may have been speaking different emotional languages for years. He claims to be empathetic, but I believe he conflates empathy with sympathy. It’s a critical distinction that can make or break a bond.

​Sympathy is feeling for someone. It’s looking down into the pit of their struggle from a safe distance and saying, “Wow, that looks terrible.” It’s an act of separation. Empathy, on the other hand, is climbing down into the pit to be with them, not to fix it, but to communicate a simple, powerful message: you are not alone. As researcher Brené Brown puts it, “Empathy has no script. There is no right way or wrong way to do it. It’s simply listening, holding space, withholding judgment, emotionally connecting, and communicating that incredibly healing message of ‘You’re not alone.’”⁽¹⁾

​When there is a fundamental misunderstanding of empathy vs. sympathy in a marriage, trust begins to erode. One partner offers pity when the other needs presence. For me, empathy is a synonym for love. It’s the ultimate act of valuing another person, of seeing their plight as worthy of your full, undivided attention. Philosopher Simone Weil called this level of focus, “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.”⁽⁸⁾ Sympathy, with its inherent barrier, feels like a hollow substitute. It’s an acknowledgment without connection.

​The Earthquake After the Illness: Can a Health Crisis Kill Empathy?

​A major health crisis is a seismic event. It shakes the ground beneath a relationship, and each partner can feel the tremors differently. For me, surviving David’s brain tumor strengthened my resolve. It was proof of our bond, a testament to our commitment. For him, was it something else? Did the surgery, in removing the tumor, also remove a filter, setting him “free” to reevaluate his life, his needs, and his definition of happiness?t

Illness is the night-side of life, a more onerous citizenship. Everyone who is born holds dual citizenship, in the kingdom of the well and in the kingdom of the sick.

Susan Sontag ⁽²⁾

​It’s a painful but necessary question to ask after a divorce after a partner’s illness: Can such an event change a person’s capacity for empathy? The experience of facing one’s own mortality can be profoundly isolating. The neurologist Oliver Sacks observed, “In examining disease, we gain wisdom about anatomy and physiology and biology. In examining the person with disease, we gain wisdom about life.”⁽⁵⁾ It’s possible that this newfound “wisdom” can lead to a radical reprioritization where personal survival—emotional, physical, spiritual—overrides everything else, including the feelings of a partner.

The person you knew might be gone, replaced by someone with a different operating system, and a different understanding of their obligations to others. As the late Stephen Hawking noted, “We are all different, but we share the same human spirit. Perhaps it’s human nature that we adapt and survive.”⁽¹⁰⁾ Sometimes, that adaptation comes at a cost to those closest to us.

​The Empathy Spectrum: Is Your Partner Incapable or Unwilling?

​It’s tempting to label an unempathetic husband or partner as a narcissist or a sociopath. But empathy isn’t a simple on/off switch; it’s a spectrum. There are gradations. Psychologists often distinguish between:

  • ​Affective Empathy: The ability to feel another person’s emotions along with them. This is the shared joy or shared pain that creates deep bonds.
  • Cognitive Empathy: The ability to understand what another person might be feeling or thinking. One can understand the emotion without feeling it.

​Is it possible my husband possesses cognitive empathy—he can understand my pain—but lacks the affective empathy to feel it with me? Or more chillingly, does he use that understanding to adjust his own moral compass, justifying his actions by minimizing my circumstances to fit his narrative? We negotiate with ourselves to maintain our self-image. If seeing your partner’s pain fully would force you to see yourself as the villain, it might be easier to recalibrate your ethics and decide their pain isn’t so bad after all.

​This internal negotiation is a betrayal of the highest order. As therapist Esther Perel says, “Trust is the active engagement with the unknown. Trust is the readiness to take a risk, to go where you can’t see, to be vulnerable.”⁽⁴⁾ When a partner refuses to be vulnerable with your pain, they break that trust at its core. It’s a profound emotional disconnection that leaves you feeling utterly alone in your own home.

​The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.

– Carl Rogers⁽¹³⁾

​How to Move Forward When There’s No Empathy

​If you are facing a lack of empathy in your relationship, the path forward is fraught with pain and uncertainty, but you are not powerless. Recognizing the reality of your situation is the first, most crucial step. You cannot force someone to feel something they are unable or unwilling to feel.

​Here are some key steps to consider as you navigate this difficult reality:

  • ​Stop Blaming Yourself: Their inability to connect with your feelings is not a reflection of your worth or the validity of your emotions. Your pain is real, whether they acknowledge it or not.
  • Seek External Validation: Talk to trusted friends, family, or a therapist. Hearing “You’re not crazy” from an outside source can be an essential anchor when your reality is being denied at home.
  • Establish Firm Boundaries: Protect your emotional well-being. This may mean limiting conversations about certain topics, creating physical distance, or refusing to engage in arguments designed to invalidate your feelings.
  • Differentiate Between the Person and the Condition: Is this a new behavior linked to an event (like illness or trauma), or has it always been this way? Understanding the source can inform your decision, but it doesn’t excuse the impact.
  • Prioritize Your Own Well-Being: You cannot pour from an empty cup. Focus on what recharges you and what makes you feel seen and valued, even if it’s outside the relationship. As artist Frida Kahlo powerfully stated, “I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best. The subject I want to know better.”⁽¹⁴⁾

​Rebuilding Yourself When the Foundation is Gone

​What happens when you realize the foundation of your life together was built on an illusion of shared feeling? You grieve. You grieve the partner you thought you had, the future you thought you were building, and the love you thought was reciprocal. The writer Haruki Murakami wisely noted, “Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional.”⁽¹²⁾ The pain of this realization is real, but choosing not to suffer means choosing to rebuild on a new foundation: yourself.

​To be a good human being is to have a kind of openness to the world, an ability to trust uncertain things beyond your own control.

– Martha Nussbaum⁽⁶⁾

​A lack of empathy is a lack of love. It makes it easier to expel, to retreat, to disconnect from the community of a relationship. It allows a person to inflict harm because they are insulated from the fallout. But for the person left behind, the lesson is not that love is impossible, but that it must begin with a radical empathy for oneself. To forgive yourself for not seeing it sooner. To value yourself as you wanted to be valued. And to understand, as Dostoevsky suggested, that “To love someone means to see them as God intended them,”⁽⁷⁾ and sometimes, that means seeing them clearly enough to let them go. In the end, we can only control our own capacity for love, and that must be enough.

​Further Reading List

Same-sex Divorce Articles

​Footnotes

  • ​⁽¹⁾ Brené Brown, “Brené Brown on Empathy,” RSA Short, 2013
  • ⁽²⁾ Susan Sontag, Illness as Metaphor, 1978.⁽³⁾ James Baldwin, Nobody Knows My Name, 1961.
  • ⁽⁴⁾ Esther Perel, Where Should We Begin? podcast, ongoing.
  • ⁽⁵⁾ Oliver Sacks, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales, 1985.
  • ⁽⁶⁾ Martha Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, 1986.
  • ⁽⁷⁾ Attributed to Fyodor Dostoevsky, a sentiment widely seen as summarizing a key theme in his works.
  • ⁽⁸⁾ Simone Weil, Gravity and Grace, 1947.
  • ⁽⁹⁾ Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace, 1869.
  • ⁽¹⁰⁾ Stephen Hawking, Lecture at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2006.
  • ⁽¹¹⁾ Alain de Botton, The Course of Love, 2016.
  • ⁽¹²⁾ Haruki Murakami, What I Talk About When I Talk About Running, 2007.
  • ⁽¹³⁾ Carl Rogers, On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy, 1961.
  • ⁽¹⁴⁾ Frida Kahlo, from her personal diary, published in The Diary of Frida Kahlo: An Intimate Self-Portrait, 1995.
  • ⁽¹⁵⁾ Daniel Goleman, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, 1995.

Discover more from Alex Westerman

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments