This reflection on divorce highlights the emotional disconnection and trust fragility inherent in relationships. It questions the value of love when it remains unrecognized and unsupported. The narrative reveals the painful truths of emotional asymmetry, suggesting love alone is insufficient to sustain a marriage, leaving one with profound feelings of solitude.
- It discusses the emotional asymmetry experienced during divorce, illustrating the disconnect between partners’ understanding of love.
- The loss of extended family and the pain of ‘cutoff culture’ during divorce reveals the fragility of trust and alliances.
- Understanding emotions can bring clarity but often exposes painful truths about love and incompatibility.
- Ultimately, the article questions the value of love when it lacks recognition and support, reflecting on deep feelings amidst relational loss.
Introduction: The Unanticipated Silence
Divorce is rarely a sudden event for both parties. For the one who leaves, the separation is often the final step in a long, silent journey of detachment. For the one left behind, however, the world stops spinning in an instant. This creates a profound psychological asymmetry. In the dissolution of my twenty-year marriage to David, I faced a revelation that was as enlightening as it was heartbreaking.
I believed our life was “hunky dory.” I assumed our two decades of history guaranteed that any friction would pass. I was wrong. The act of separation revealed a stark truth: while he had depleted his emotional reserves, my commitment had only deepened. As the American writer Joan Didion famously observed regarding grief, “Life changes in the instant. The ordinary instant.” (1) This article explores a difficult question: Can love survive in a person who has weathered so much damage, and does it matter if it does?
Table of contents
The Asymmetry of Realization
There is a fundamental difference in how individuals process reality. I learn through experience; I need to touch the flame to know it burns. David, my overly analytic husband, operated in the theoretical. He lived in his head, while I lived in the moment.
This difference became the fulcrum of our separation. I could not intellectually simulate the end of our marriage; I had to experience the crushing weight of his absence to understand the volume of my love. It brings to mind the words of French philosopher Roland Barthes in A Lover’s Discourse: “The lover’s fatal identity is precisely this: I am the one who waits.” (2)
In hindsight, I see that my love encompassed my entire being in ways I did not recognize while we were together. Perhaps David left because he could not see that commitment, or worse, he saw it and feared it. We often reject what we cannot control. The tragedy lies in the timing. I recognized the magnitude of my devotion only after he rejected it.
The Loss of the “Blood Alliance”
One of the most disruptive aspects of same-sex marriage dissolution is the “secondary loss” of the extended family. When David left, he didn’t just remove himself; he removed a support system I had labored to build.
Trust is a fragile architecture. After previous breaches of trust, regaining my footing with David was difficult. Extending that trust to his family was an even greater mountain to climb. David pressured me to connect, to integrate, to make his family my own. I embraced this challenge. Even traveling across the United States to visit relatives I barely knew. I forged bonds with women who became surrogate mothers to me.
Sociologist Andrew Solomon notes, “Family is the theatre in which the drama of our identity is enacted.” (3) I acted my part faithfully. I felt integrated into the fabric of his clan. Yet, as the divorce proceedings drag on, a line has been drawn in the sand. The people who claimed I was a son, who promised I was “family,” have cut off communication.
This is the “cutoff culture” of modern divorce. It renders years of emotional labor null and void. We hear the cliché at weddings: “We aren’t losing a son; we are gaining a daughter.” But reality proves that these alliances often exist only as long as the legal contract holds. To have that love turned off like a faucet is a specific type of trauma. It forces one to ask: What is the point of strong bonds if they are so easily dissolved?
The Burden of Understanding
Here lies the paradox I find myself in. I have so much love, and I gave so much love, yet it was extinguished by the very people who assured me I was safe.
This is not a story of bouncing back. It is a story of realizing that you can do everything right—you can work on the trust, you can build the alliances, you can commit with your whole heart—and it can still amount to nothing in the eyes of the other person. As the absurdist Albert Camus wrote, “There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night.” (4) I am currently in the night, and I am finding that the night is long.
This persistence of my love for David is not a triumph; it is a haunting. I pine for a man who is actively dismantling our life. It suggests that our marriage was inhabited by two completely different realities. In my reality, we were a fortress. In his, we were a prison he was plotting to escape.
The Cold Reality of Divergence
We are often told that understanding brings peace. I disagree. Understanding simply illuminates the wreckage.
I now understand that David and I were fundamentally incompatible in how we processed emotion. He could detach analytically; I could only detach through the slow, agonizing death of the heart. The divorce has shown me that love is not a universal language. I was speaking a dialect he never truly wanted to learn.
Renowned author bell hooks wrote, “The practice of love offers no place of safety. We risk loss, hurt, pain. We risk being acted upon by forces outside our control.” (5) The force outside my control was David’s indifference. The hard truth is that my love, no matter how vast, was insufficient to sustain a marriage that one person had already mentally exited.
Conclusion
There is no satisfying resolve here. There is no moral victory in being the one who loved more, or the one who stayed loyal to the “blood alliances” that crumbled.
New York City, where we built our life, is indifferent to our individual sorrows. As the iconic writer E.B. White said of this city, “It can destroy an individual, or it can fulfill him.” (6) Right now, I am looking at the destruction.
Can love survive in a person who has weathered so much damage? Perhaps. But the more pertinent question is: What is the value of that love when it has no home? I am left with a surplus of affection and loyalty for a husband who no longer exists and a family that has erased me. This is not resilience. This is simply the cold, hard math of a unilateral divorce. The settlement will eventually come, papers will be signed, but the understanding I have gained offers no comfort—only the quiet, final confirmation that I was alone in this marriage long before he actually left.
Further Reading
- The Wisdom of the Broken Heart by Susan Piver
- Blue Nights by Joan Didion
- The Velvet Rage by Alan Downs
- Attachments by Dr. Tim Clinton and Dr. Gary Sibcy
Same-sex divorce Articles
- The Vodka, The Dog, and The Architecture of Us: Why Rituals Save Relationships
Key Takeaways Relationship rituals are an important part of building strong partnerships. This article explores how personal rituals—like pre-flight vodka or nightly dog walks—act as the glue in long-term relationships. It examines the unique burden and freedom same-sex couples face in creating these traditions without a historical script. Finally, it parallels the loss of… - The Discarded by Family: Anatomy of a Sudden Social Death
Key Takeaways & Summary Summary: This article explores the emotional journey of being discarded by family and how one finds the strength to overcome it. This article explores the painful and often overlooked phenomenon of “social disposability” in the wake of a long-term relationship breakdown. Using a personal narrative of a 20-year same-sex marriage…
- The Ivy League Wall: When Intelligence Becomes a Weapon in Divorce
Key Takeaways and Summary Summary: Intellectual weaponization in divorce is a tactic some individuals use to gain an upper hand. This article explores the painful intersection of high-conflict divorce and intellectual elitism. Through a personal narrative regarding the end of a 20-year same-sex relationship, I try to unpack the concept of “intellectual weaponization” –…
- The Architecture of Loss: Designing “Synthetic Memories” in the Age of Divorce
Key Takeaways Synthetic Memories: The Danger of Visualizing the ‘Never-Was’ in Divorce Divorce is rarely just a legal separation; it is a dismantling of a shared future. For decades, the only artifacts left behind were wedding albums and physical mementos—static reminders of what was. But today, artificial intelligence has handed us a new, sharper…
- The Asymmetry of Love: The Unresolved Reality of Divorce
Key Takeaways This reflection on divorce highlights the emotional disconnection and trust fragility inherent in relationships. It questions the value of love when it remains unrecognized and unsupported. The narrative reveals the painful truths of emotional asymmetry, suggesting love alone is insufficient to sustain a marriage, leaving one with profound feelings of solitude. Introduction:…
- The Silence After the Crash: The Raw Reality of Being Left Behind
My husband, David, served me with divorce papers after a 20-year same-sex relationship, making it an unwanted divorce for me. That sentence is short. It is clinical. It implies a legal transaction. But for the person standing on the receiving end of those papers, it is the sound of a guillotine blade dropping on…
roto ergo sum!
Footnotes
- (1) Didion, Joan. The Year of Magical Thinking. Alfred A. Knopf, 2005.
- (2) Barthes, Roland. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. Hill and Wang, 1978.
- (3) Solomon, Andrew. Far From the Tree: Parents, Children and the Search for Identity. Scribner, 2012.
- (4) Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. Gallimard, 1942.
- (5) hooks, bell. All About Love: New Visions. William Morrow, 2000.
- (6) White, E.B. Here is New York. Harper & Brothers, 1949.
Discover more from Alex Westerman
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.