My husband, David, served me with divorce papers after a 20-year same-sex relationship, making it an unwanted divorce for me.
That sentence is short. It is clinical. It implies a legal transaction. But for the person standing on the receiving end of those papers, it is the sound of a guillotine blade dropping on a life two decades in the making.
If you scour the internet for advice on unwanted divorce, you are immediately inundated with a very specific brand of optimism. There are mountains of academic research on separation. Loads of therapists writing SEO-optimized blog articles promising that this is the first day of the rest of your life. Then there are the plethora of magazines driving subscriptions with headlines about “Getting Your Groove Back.”
But what about the people like me? What about the people who have been utterly destroyed by the end of a same-sex relationship they thought was permanent?
I am writing this to cut through the noise. I want to share a perspective you won’t find on the optimistic recovery forums. This is for those of us grappling with divorce depression, who feel the saccharine promise that “everything happens for a reason” is not just a lie, but an insult.
This article explores the brutal, unvarnished reality of being the spouse “left behind” after a long-term marriage ends. It challenges the prevailing cultural narrative that divorce is always a gateway to self-discovery and offers a sincere look at the void that remains.
- The Reality of Unwanted Divorce: Why the “it gets better” narrative fails those who did not choose to leave.
- The Collapse of Community: How social circles and family support systems often fracture or vanish in the wake of a breakup.
- The Weight of Numbness: Understanding that the “new normal” may not be happiness, but a state of emotional neutrality or emptiness.
- Reframing Contentment: Moving away from ambition and material attachment toward a simple, stripped-bare existence.
The Toxic Positivity of “Moving On”
We live in a culture that is uncomfortable with grief. As a result, the advice given to the “left behind” spouse is filtered through a relentlessly optimistic lens. You are told you will create your own holidays. You are told you will find yourself as an individual again. The internet wants us to believe that life is a constant upward trajectory of self-improvement.
But life is not the way the internet wants us to believe it is. It is hard, it is messy, and sometimes, it simply does not work out.
The writer Joan Didion, a native New Yorker who understood the architecture of grief better than almost anyone, wrote, “Grief turns out to be a place none of us know until we reach it.” (1)
The reality of surviving divorce when you didn’t want it is that there is no immediate “righting” of the ship. There is no magical pivot where I suddenly realize I’m better off. David left before. He knew what my reaction would be. He knew my history with severe depression. Yet, he handed me those papers regardless, deciding he wanted nothing to do with my mental health.
I am not looking for a silver lining. As the philosopher Emil Cioran noted, “It is not worth the bother of killing yourself, since you always kill yourself too late.” (2) That sounds bleak, but there is a strange comfort in acknowledging that the worst has already happened. The catastrophe is not in the future; it is the present.
When the Support System Collapses
Another relentless call to action in the recovery narrative is the advice to “find your tribe.” We are told to lean on support groups, family, and kindred spirits.
But what happens when your support system is completely upended because of the divorce?
The people I would rely on in a crisis are no longer in my family. Even after 20 years, I was closed out. Friends we made together have disappeared or, worse, aligned themselves with my ex-husband. The loss of friends after divorce is a secondary trauma that nobody prepares you for.
I find myself grappling with a new normal that is defined by solitude. Is it so bad that my future holds holidays alone? That I might become a shut-in? The iconic artist Edward Hopper captured this feeling in his paintings of New York—the profound isolation that can exist even in a crowded city. As art critic Olivia Laing observed about Hopper’s work, “Loneliness is difficult to confess; difficult too to categorize. Like depression, a state with which it often intersects, it can run deep in the fabric of a person.” (3)
I am living in that fabric now. This isn’t a transition period. This is the texture of my life.
The Numbness of the Void
There are times in my life when I have entered severe depression. David knew this. He set me up for failure, fully aware that I simply cannot “snap out of it.”
Intellectually, I can articulate what is happening to me. I know the steps a therapist would tell me to take. But I have no willpower. I have no desire to do anything. It is as if all the life was sucked out of me.
I now know what it feels like to be numb. It isn’t sadness, exactly. More like a void. The absence of the things that used to make me happy.
Sylvia Plath described this paralysis perfectly in The Bell Jar: “I felt very still and empty, the way the eye of a tornado must feel, moving dully along in the middle of the surrounding hullabaloo.” (4)
I am in the eye of the tornado. The world spins on—people go to brunch, they date, they post on Instagram—but I am moving dully. The drive that used to fuel my curiosity has become meaningless.
Reframing Contentment
This brings me to the objects that used to define me. The things I held dearly and imbued with meaning—art, design, collectibles—I now have no need for them. It is as if I am stripped bare.
Some might describe this as a spiritual awakening, akin to enlightened Buddhism. But my awakening is not spiritual. It is just nothing. Nothing at all.
I have to ask myself: Am I content with this new normal?
I think I need to reframe what “content” means. With David, contentment meant the world was our oyster. We were on a journey together. Without David, contentment is simply existing. It is breathing, eating, and waiting.
Andy Warhol, a man who understood the surface of things better than anyone, once said, “When you do something exactly wrong, you always turn up something.” (5) Perhaps this “wrongness”—this unwanted divorce, this total collapse of my previous life—has turned up a state of being that is brutally honest.
The writer Susan Sontag noted, “Depression is melancholy minus its charms.” (6) I have lost the charms of my previous life. The optimism is gone. The ambition is gone.
But I am still here. I am writing this. And perhaps there is value in simply stating, without sugarcoating, that being left behind hurts, that it destroys, and that sometimes, you don’t bounce back. You just endure.
As the playwright Samuel Beckett famously wrote in The Unnamable, “You must go on. I can’t go on. I’ll go on.” (7)
That is where I am. I can’t go on. And yet, I will.
Footnotes
- Didion, Joan. The Year of Magical Thinking. Alfred A. Knopf, 2005.
- Cioran, Emil. The Trouble with Being Born. Viking Press, 1976.
- Laing, Olivia. The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone. Picador, 2016.
- Plath, Sylvia. The Bell Jar. Heinemann, 1963.
- Warhol, Andy. The Philosophy of Andy Warhol (From A to B and Back Again). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.
- Sontag, Susan. Illness as Metaphor. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978.
- Beckett, Samuel. The Unnamable. Olympia Press, 1953.
Same-sex divorce Articles
- The Architecture of Separation: The Paradox of Selfishness in DivorceKey Takeaways This article explores the confusing paradox between societal altruism and the acceptance of selfishness in divorce. It examines the breakdown of a 20-year same-sex marriage through the lens of design and language. We are taught the geometry of kindness in kindergarten. We learn that a circle includes everyone and share our blocks.…
- When Memories Become Weapons: Navigating Ambiguous LossArticle Summary & Key Takeaways The Gist: Ambiguous Loss refers to a type of loss that is difficult to define or lack clear closure. This article explores the psychological concept of “Ambiguous Loss” through the lens of a painful same-sex divorce after an 18-year relationship. It examines why grieving a living ex-partner often feels…
- The Vodka, The Dog, and The Architecture of Us: Why Rituals Save RelationshipsKey Takeaways Relationship rituals are an important part of building strong partnerships. This article explores how personal rituals—like pre-flight vodka or nightly dog walks—act as the glue in long-term relationships. It examines the unique burden and freedom same-sex couples face in creating these traditions without a historical script. Finally, it parallels the loss of…
- The Discarded by Family: Anatomy of a Sudden Social DeathKey Takeaways & Summary Summary: This article explores the emotional journey of being discarded by family and how one finds the strength to overcome it. This article explores the painful and often overlooked phenomenon of “social disposability” in the wake of a long-term relationship breakdown. Using a personal narrative of a 20-year same-sex marriage…
- The Ivy League Wall: When Intelligence Becomes a Weapon in DivorceKey Takeaways and Summary Summary: Intellectual weaponization in divorce is a tactic some individuals use to gain an upper hand. This article explores the painful intersection of high-conflict divorce and intellectual elitism. Through a personal narrative regarding the end of a 20-year same-sex relationship, I try to unpack the concept of “intellectual weaponization” –…
- The Architecture of Loss: Designing “Synthetic Memories” in the Age of DivorceKey Takeaways Synthetic Memories: The Danger of Visualizing the ‘Never-Was’ in Divorce Divorce is rarely just a legal separation; it is a dismantling of a shared future. For decades, the only artifacts left behind were wedding albums and physical mementos—static reminders of what was. But today, artificial intelligence has handed us a new, sharper…
roto ergo sum!
Discover more from Alex Westerman
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.